Greg Feek
Forwards / scrum lens
Likely lens
Standards under pressure
Concrete rugby proof, clear ownership, and whether the detail survives the week.
Set PieceAccountabilityPressureRole Clarity
RugbyPrint onboarding
See how a coaching group actually works together.
RugbyPrint turns individual coaching profiles into a staff-room operating read: how the group communicates, where it aligns, where friction appears, and what a club should do next.
Select scenario
Blues coaching group example
The default scenario uses Greg Feek, Tasesa Lavea, and M. Howling as a realistic staff-room example. No quiz is required to understand the product outcome.
Tasesa Lavea
Attack / game-shape lens
Likely lens
Pictures and connection
The shape behind the moment, player relationships, and how the next action connects.
Visual MapsAdaptabilityRelationshipsPhase Play
M. Howling
Performance / decision rhythm
Likely lens
Preparation into action
A clean move from evidence to meeting point, training cue, or intervention.
PreparationTrendsConcise TakeawaysInterventions
Group snapshot
One operating read for the room
This is the first product moment: not a personality label, but a practical read on how the coaching group should work.
How this group naturally works
The room has enough technical, attacking, and preparation coverage to create a strong full-staff read. The useful pattern is not one dominant voice; it is a sequence.
What they cover well
Set-piece standards, attacking pictures, player connection, and week-to-week translation all have a strong owner in the room.
Where friction may show up
The same issue can be framed as a standard, a shape, or an intervention. If the order is wrong, agreement may look like disagreement.
What voice may be missing
The group may need one person to explicitly hold uncertainty: what is proven, what is only a read, and what still needs evidence.
Coach comparison
How the same room hears the same issue
The useful view is not who is right. It is how to sequence the conversation so each lens adds value.
| Lens | Greg Feek | Tasesa Lavea | M. Howling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision style | Name the standard and consequence. | Read the picture and adjust. | Turn the read into next action. |
| Evidence preference | Set-piece outcomes, pressure moments, role execution. | Clips, maps, spacing, connection across phases. | Trends, preparation signals, concise takeaways. |
| Meeting rhythm | Direct standard first. | Picture and possibility first. | Priority and intervention first. |
| Communication risk | Can sound final before the room has explored the shape. | Can sound open-ended when others want ownership. | Can compress debate before everyone is aligned. |
| Best way to brief them | Start with the standard, then show the evidence. | Start with the picture, then name the adjustment. | Start with the priority, then name the intervention. |
Staff meeting simulation
Post-match review: exits under pressure
A real coaching-room moment. RugbyPrint shows how each coach might enter the same issue, then recommends the order of conversation.
Greg Feek
Likely to ask whether the review names the standard clearly enough for players and staff to own it.
Tasesa Lavea
Likely to test whether the same issue is a shape problem, a connection problem, or a timing problem.
M. Howling
Likely to ask what changes this week and what signal should be tracked next.
Pilot builder
Choose the first club use case
Turn interest into a small, specific pilot with a clear output.
Pilot focus
Recommended package
Staff operating model
Map how the coaching group should run meetings, divide ownership, and brief players before the season starts.
Profiles
Group briefing
60-min review